My church's position on abortion
Apr. 12th, 2009 05:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
twirlgrrlI was researching my church's doctrines on other issues today and came across their position statement on abortion. I've thought about posting it before but finally decided to today.
I think people have a hard time integrating the fact that I belong to a conservative church, one that can be considered fundamentalist (in the sense of Biblical interpretation, not in the evangelical/"religious right" sense--we don't do that stuff.) I understand why this is confounding, and if you've read my LJ for any length of time you will probably know why I don't consider myself exactly orthodox or mainstream SDA. To say the least! LOL. New people, don't ditch me yet!
But I think that this position statement on abortion illustrates something about my church. I consider the church entity a scholarly, reasoned, precise and individualistic concern. There is no one between the individual believer and God; there is no confession; there is a lot more room than most people (even most members) realize for individual interpretation of one's own spiritual path. It's very Protestant that way. Adventists are known for things like lifestyle restrictions, but these are not heaven-or-hell rules, they are guidelines, and they are not intrusively enforced. For instance, Adventists are advised to be vegetarians, but I'd bet that the majority are not, and no one is going to go to hell for eating whatever s/he wants. I find it fascinating how adept the official church language often is when advocating a conservative lifestyle without advocating any particular political position.
(For the Adventists and/or former Adventists reading this, I'm talking about my experience exploring church doctrine on paper, not my experience with actual members of the church. I'm well aware that a lot of them get this all horribly wrong. Also, I can think of at least one other position statement that I'm not so enamored of, but I think they're probably wrong about that one.)
OK, well, anyway, here is the statement excerpt I'm talking about. Notice that every word was carefully chosen, and notice what is NOT said.
--------------
Abortion: The SDA takes a position between the strict pro-life and strict pro-choice alternatives. A set of "Guidelines on Abortion" was approved by the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists Executive Committee on 1992-OCT-12. It says in part:
"The Church does not serve as conscience for individuals; however, it should provide moral guidance. Abortions for reasons of birth control, gender selection, or convenience are not condoned by the Church. Women, at times however, may face exceptional circumstances that present serious moral or medical dilemmas, such as significant threats to the pregnant woman's life, serious jeopardy to her health, severe congenital defects carefully diagnosed in the fetus, and pregnancy resulting from rape or incest. The final decision whether to terminate the pregnancy or not should be made by the pregnant woman after appropriate consultation. She should be aided in her decision by accurate information, biblical principles, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Moreover, these decisions are best made within the context of healthy family relationships."
---------------
Isn't that interesting? I don't think it would please either a pro-life person OR a pro-choice person entirely.
There's a lot of interweb craziness out there about SDAs, and I can't get the site that I trust to come up, so I can't quote the rest of the statement right now. But I remember that it emphasizes love and support to the woman who has to make such an unfortunate decision. The whole thing is kindof like "Yeah, abortion is a bummer, and we'd rather that it didn't have to happen at all, but if it does happen it's a private thing, and the woman facing the decision needs support." There's nothing about politics, or laws, or hell, or kicking anyone out of the church. And "not condoned" is not the harshest thing they could have said about abortions "of convenience." Y'know?
I'm interested in the thoughts of anyone who wishes to express them, but I recognize that this is a very sensitive subject and I didn't post this to start any fights. So I'm screening comments. If you choose to comment let me know if you want it unscreened, otherwise it will stay screened.
I think people have a hard time integrating the fact that I belong to a conservative church, one that can be considered fundamentalist (in the sense of Biblical interpretation, not in the evangelical/"religious right" sense--we don't do that stuff.) I understand why this is confounding, and if you've read my LJ for any length of time you will probably know why I don't consider myself exactly orthodox or mainstream SDA. To say the least! LOL. New people, don't ditch me yet!
But I think that this position statement on abortion illustrates something about my church. I consider the church entity a scholarly, reasoned, precise and individualistic concern. There is no one between the individual believer and God; there is no confession; there is a lot more room than most people (even most members) realize for individual interpretation of one's own spiritual path. It's very Protestant that way. Adventists are known for things like lifestyle restrictions, but these are not heaven-or-hell rules, they are guidelines, and they are not intrusively enforced. For instance, Adventists are advised to be vegetarians, but I'd bet that the majority are not, and no one is going to go to hell for eating whatever s/he wants. I find it fascinating how adept the official church language often is when advocating a conservative lifestyle without advocating any particular political position.
(For the Adventists and/or former Adventists reading this, I'm talking about my experience exploring church doctrine on paper, not my experience with actual members of the church. I'm well aware that a lot of them get this all horribly wrong. Also, I can think of at least one other position statement that I'm not so enamored of, but I think they're probably wrong about that one.)
OK, well, anyway, here is the statement excerpt I'm talking about. Notice that every word was carefully chosen, and notice what is NOT said.
--------------
Abortion: The SDA takes a position between the strict pro-life and strict pro-choice alternatives. A set of "Guidelines on Abortion" was approved by the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists Executive Committee on 1992-OCT-12. It says in part:
"The Church does not serve as conscience for individuals; however, it should provide moral guidance. Abortions for reasons of birth control, gender selection, or convenience are not condoned by the Church. Women, at times however, may face exceptional circumstances that present serious moral or medical dilemmas, such as significant threats to the pregnant woman's life, serious jeopardy to her health, severe congenital defects carefully diagnosed in the fetus, and pregnancy resulting from rape or incest. The final decision whether to terminate the pregnancy or not should be made by the pregnant woman after appropriate consultation. She should be aided in her decision by accurate information, biblical principles, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Moreover, these decisions are best made within the context of healthy family relationships."
---------------
Isn't that interesting? I don't think it would please either a pro-life person OR a pro-choice person entirely.
There's a lot of interweb craziness out there about SDAs, and I can't get the site that I trust to come up, so I can't quote the rest of the statement right now. But I remember that it emphasizes love and support to the woman who has to make such an unfortunate decision. The whole thing is kindof like "Yeah, abortion is a bummer, and we'd rather that it didn't have to happen at all, but if it does happen it's a private thing, and the woman facing the decision needs support." There's nothing about politics, or laws, or hell, or kicking anyone out of the church. And "not condoned" is not the harshest thing they could have said about abortions "of convenience." Y'know?
I'm interested in the thoughts of anyone who wishes to express them, but I recognize that this is a very sensitive subject and I didn't post this to start any fights. So I'm screening comments. If you choose to comment let me know if you want it unscreened, otherwise it will stay screened.
