You know, I'm glad so many of my friends are cheating on LJ having so much fun with facebook. But I peeked at it this morning and realized that unless I check facebook multiple times a day I am no longer going to know what's going on in the lives of many of my friends.
Facebook is cute, facebook is fun, facebook is a very simple way to stay in contact with a whole bunch of people. I'm glad it's there! I'm probably mostly glad that the memes and quizzes and such are moving over there. But... it's so impermanent! It's not a historical record. Things scroll down off the screen and poof, they're gone. That's my big problem with facebook. I'm a saver. I'm not down with the disposable aspect of modern culture.
*pout*
Facebook is cute, facebook is fun, facebook is a very simple way to stay in contact with a whole bunch of people. I'm glad it's there! I'm probably mostly glad that the memes and quizzes and such are moving over there. But... it's so impermanent! It's not a historical record. Things scroll down off the screen and poof, they're gone. That's my big problem with facebook. I'm a saver. I'm not down with the disposable aspect of modern culture.
*pout*
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:48 pm (UTC)I mostly post to Facebook these days because I have a new set of friends (my roommate and her friends) who don't have LJ.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:01 pm (UTC)I guess putting it as anti-FB is a little strong... mostly, I'm happy with LJ and don't need another internet time waster, plus the anti-breastfeeding pictures stance of FB threw me off. Add to that that I'm not really all that keen on old boyfriends/ ex friends finding me on FB (and have heard some stories that have me convinced of that not being a Good Thing) AND the fact that my asshole ex-best friend is on there, and... well, I'm not planning on setting up an account anytime soon!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 09:06 pm (UTC)Word. And it's true more and more. Text messages instead of phone calls. Twitter instead of journals. Journals instead of letters. Remember letters? Remember having to sit down and call or write _one_ person to be able to tell them what is going on with you?
What changes do we make to the things we say if, instead of speaking to an individual or small group of friends, we are putting out a message or statement for dozens of people to consume? Does it remove us from real intimacy in our relationships?
That said, I do love that on facebook I can get a quick glimpse of what's going on with people I don't see these days (old friends from high school and college or Matt's extended family).
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:00 pm (UTC)For a while I wished that some of my closest friends would be LJ-active, mostly because I didn't have a social life outside of LJ at all, taking care of Blue and work and Evan took up all the time when other people would be awake for phone calls. But now I understand that there are LJ people and non-LJ people, computer people and non-computer people, and I have more time to spend on ALL my friendships, so I've given up on expectations in favor of trying to meet people where they are. Unfortunately I have realized that I can't meet people where they are if they're only active on facebook. I'll have to catch up with them in other ways.
I used to be weirded out by filters, but for me they are a great answer to your question about speaking to individuals, small and large groups. At least on LJ, I'm getting used to the hierarchy of intimacy and issues-based intimacy in a whole different way. On Facebook, forget it. It's only for the least revealing of interactions.
There's lots more to say about that aspect of how technology changes social interactions. I find the whole topic fascinating, especially because I'm so involved in online communities of various sorts.
And yes, to your last sentence. That's exactly what I find it's good for. But I'd be unsatisfied with JUST that, if some of my dearest LJ friends jumped ship entirely.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 03:28 am (UTC)I'm sticking with LJ ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 04:00 pm (UTC)